Year in review

Posted: December 15, 2009 in CRM

Every year-end I write two columns.  One looks back on the prior year’s forecast the other looks ahead.  This is the first of the two and it’s time to compare my projections for the year with what actually happened.

Last year I took an optimistic approach by saying that it was a great time for innovation.  You might recall there was plenty to worry about back then.  We had a new president not quite in office and the scuttlebutt was of spending upwards of a trillion dollars in borrowed money to fix the meltdown.  Some people said it wasn’t enough.  A year later we see they were right and the administration is developing a jobs program to spend more billions.

I am not averse to deficit spending when the occasion requires it and this is certainly the time.  But to get more fine grained let’s consider my projections for individual companies.

I said, “The team to beat, they’ll keep the pedal to the metal in 2009 and they will be amply rewarded for it.”  No need to spend a lot of time here.


I said, “I expect they will become more platform-like in the year ahead and offer some competition to the leaders.”  Sugar did this but they seem to be more mired in the recession and the freeware business model so they didn’t impress me with their execution.  Still they have some good ideas.


I said, “I expect that 2009 might see more of a clash of definitions as on-demand, SaaS etc. become even more popular and companies like this try to blur or expand the definition.”  I was talking about the blurring of the line between multi-tenant SaaS and other on-demand strategies and it appears that the blurring has happened and not just at Oracle.  As I recently wrote, that blur will be with us for a while as SAP, Microsoft and Sage all have their own strategies to take some of the nicer features from SaaS to support the on-premise based solution sets.  But definitions were a side-show, Oracle introduced its Fusion products this year and they have the ability to be game changers for the company by making all the acquisitions make sense.


I said, “In 2009, Microsoft could benefit from a bit more focus on the market and committing to real on-demand.”  Well, they provided focus and they provided a product set that, like other solution sets runs in a variety of configurations, both on-demand and on-premise.  The company appears to be executing well and although I question some of their strategies, it all seems to be working for them.  Only proves I am not the smartest guy in the room.


I said, “… they haven’t helped themselves with their false starts and I wish them well trying to put a big idea together and deliver it, hopefully in 2009.”  The big idea was their hybrid approach and it appears to make more sense for them than most.  The company still needs a big idea and an out of the box thinker to promote it.


I said, “…the company, in my humble opinion, aims at a corner of the market that might be too small to take on everything they offer.  A little up market repositioning might be smart…”  I think NetSuite did this and the results are good for them.  Not a week goes by when I don’t see a press release from Mei Li detailing a new deal with a good size company.  More than most, NetSuite has some mojo.


I said, “In 2009 Sage will be in the process of changing its products to meet some of the challenges of the on-demand world and to adapt to the special needs of its partners.”  The guys at Sage kept to their knitting this year and made good progress but more needs to be done.  Sage made great efforts in CRM and on-demand strategies delivering on their 2010 CRM strategy.  They’re also one of the more effective users of social media in CRM today.  Keep an eye on them.

No one could have predicted 2009 would be such an awful year but as we end it, the economy appears to be rebounding though unemployment is still way too high.  The big lesson of 2009 is that we were doing a lot of unsustainable things.  The environment naturally comes to mind when we hear the unsustainable word but it goes for business practices like selling loans to people with no assets and no means of repaying and a lot more.  In 2010 — post-Copenhagen — look for a lot of discussion about making everything sustainable.  That will be the big incentive we need for a whole lot of innovation in business processes and the software to support them.


So, what did you think?

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s